Knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy among surgeons: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The rapid evolution of genetic technologies and utilization of genetic information for clinical decision-making has necessitated increased surgeon participation in genetic counselling, testing, and appropriate referral of patients for genetic services, without formal training in genetics. We performed a scoping review to describe surgeons' knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy in the management of patients who had confirmed cancer or who were potentially genetically at risk. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. We performed a comprehensive literature search, and 2 reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion. These studies included surgeons involved in the care of patients with confirmed gastrointestinal, breast, and endocrine and neuroendocrine cancers, or patients who were potentially genetically at risk for these cancers. RESULTS: We analyzed 17 studies, all of which used survey or interview-based formats. Many surgeons engaged in genetic counselling, testing, and referral, but reported low confidence and comfort in doing so. Knowledge assessments showed lower confidence in identifying genetic inheritance patterns and hereditary cancer syndromes, but awareness was higher among surgeons with greater clinical volume or subspecialty training in oncology. Surgeons felt responsible for facilitating these services and explicitly requested educational support in genetics. Barriers to genetic literacy were identified and catalogued at patient, surgeon, and system levels. CONCLUSION: Surgeons frequently engage in genetics-related tasks despite a lack of formal genetics training, and often report low knowledge, comfort, and confidence in providing such services. We have identified several barriers to genetic literacy that can be used to develop interventions to enhance genetic literacy among surgeons.

The hidden curriculum across medical disciplines: an examination of scope, impact, and context.

Background: While research suggests that manifestations of the hidden curriculum (HC) phenomenon have the potential to reinforce or undermine the values of an institution, very few studies have comprehensively measured its scope, impact, and the varied clinical teaching and learning contexts within which they occur. We explored the HC and examined the validity of newly developed constructs and determined the influence of context on the HC. Methods: We surveyed medical students (n =182), residents (n =148), and faculty (n = 140) from all disciplines at our institution between 2019 and 2020. Based on prior research and expertise, we measured participants' experience with the HC including perceptions of respect and disrespect for different medical disciplines, settings in which the HC is experienced, impact of the HC, personal actions, efficacy, and their institutional perceptions. We examined the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the HC constructs using exploratory factor analysis Cronbach's alpha, regression analysis and Pearson's correlations. Results: Expert judges (physician faculty and medical learners) confirmed the content validity of the items used and the analysis revealed new HC constructs reflecting negative expressions, positive impacts and expressions, negative impacts, personal actions, and positive institutional perceptions of the HC. Evidence for criterion validity was found for the negative impacts and the personal actions constructs and were significantly associated with the stage of respondents' career and gender. Support for convergent validity was obtained for HC constructs that were significantly correlated with certain contexts within which the HC occurs. Conclusion: More unique dimensions and contexts of the HC exist than have been previously documented. The findings demonstrate that specific clinical contexts can be targeted to improve negative expressions and impacts of the HC.

Contexte: Bien que la recherche suggère que les expressions du curriculum caché (CC) ont le potentiel de renforcer ou de miner les valeurs d'un établissement, très peu d'études ont mesuré de manière exhaustive sa portée, ses effets et les divers contextes d'enseignement et d'apprentissage cliniques dans lesquels elles se produisent. Nous avons exploré le CC, examiné la validité de nouvelles notions et déterminé l'influence du contexte sur le CC. Méthodes: Entre 2019 et 2020, nous avons interrogé des étudiants (n =182), des résidents (n =148) et des membres du corps professoral (n = 140) de notre établissement, toutes disciplines médicales confondues. Sur la base de recherches et d'expertises antérieures, nous avons mesuré l'expérience des participants par rapport au CC, y compris leurs perceptions du respect ou du non-respect des diverses disciplines médicales, les contextes dans lesquels ils ont été confrontés au CC, les effets et l'efficacité du CC, les perceptions de l'établissement et les actions personnelles des participants. Nous avons examiné la structure factorielle, la fiabilité et la validité des notions du CC à l'aide d'une analyse factorielle exploratoire, du coefficient alpha de Cronbach, d'une analyse de régression et des corrélations de Pearson. Résultats: Des juges experts (médecins enseignants et apprenants) ont confirmé la validité du contenu des éléments utilisés et l'analyse a révélé de nouvelles notions du CC reflétant des expressions et des effets négatifs, des expressions et des effets positifs, des actions personnelles et des perceptions positives du CC au sein des établissements. La validité de critère a été démontrée pour les notions d'impacts négatifs et d'actions personnelles et a été associée de manière significative à l'étape de la carrière des répondants et à leur sexe. La validité convergente a été confirmée pour les notions de CC qui étaient significativement corrélées à certains contextes dans lesquels le CC se manifeste. Conclusion: Il existe plus de dimensions et de contextes uniques du CC que ceux qui avaient été documentés par le passé. Nos résultats montrent que des contextes cliniques spécifiques peuvent être ciblés pour améliorer les expressions et les effets négatifs du CC.

Currencies of recognition: What rewards and recognition do Canadian distributed medical education preceptors value?

Background: Medical schools spend considerable time, effort, and money on recognition initiatives for rural and distributed medical education (DME) faculty. Previous literature has focused on intrinsic motivation to teach and there is little in the literature to guide institutional recognition efforts or to predict which items or types of recognition will be most appreciated. Methods: To better understand how rural and DME faculty in Canada value different forms of recognition, we asked faculty members from all Canadian medical schools to complete a bilingual, national online survey evaluating their perceptions of currently offered rewards and recognition. The survey received a robust response in both English and French, across nine Canadian provinces and one territory. Results: Our results indicated that there were three distinct ways that preceptors looked at recognition; these perspectives were consistent across geographic and demographic variables. These "clusters" or "currencies of recognition" included: i) Formal institutional recognition, ii) connections, growth and development, and iii) tokens of gratitude. Financial recognition was also found to be important but separate from the three clusters. Some preceptors did value support of intrinsic motivation most important, and for others extrinsic motivators, or a mix of both was most valued. Conclusions: Study results will help medical schools make effective choices in efforts to find impactful ways to recognize rural and DME faculty.

Eight ways to get a grip on intercoder reliability using qualitative-based measures.

The use of quantitative intercoder reliability measures in the analysis of qualitative research data has often generated acrimonious debates among researchers who view quantitative and qualitative research methodologies as incompatible due to their unique ontological and epistemological traditions. While these measures are invaluable in many contexts, critics point out that the use of such measures in qualitative analysis represents an attempt to import standards derived for positivist research. Guided by extant research and our experience in qualitative research, we argue that it is possible to develop a qualitative-based measure of intercoder reliability that is compatible with the interpretivist epistemological paradigm of qualitative research. We present eight qualitative research process-based guidelines for evaluating and reporting intercoder reliability in qualitative research and anticipate that these recommendations will particularly guide beginning researchers in the coding and analysis processes of qualitative data analysis.

L'utilisation de mesures quantitatives de la fidélité intercodeur dans l'analyse de données de recherche qualitative a souvent suscité des débats acrimonieux parmi les chercheurs qui considèrent qu'en raison de leurs traditions ontologiques et épistémologiques différentes, les méthodologies de recherche quantitative et qualitative sont incompatibles. Bien que ces mesures soient précieuses dans de nombreux contextes, les critiques soulignent que leur utilisation dans l'analyse qualitative constitue une tentative d'importer des normes dérivées de la recherche positiviste. Nous nous appuyons sur les recherches existantes et sur notre expérience en recherche qualitative pour soutenir qu'il est possible de développer une mesure qualitative de la fidélité intercodeur qui soit compatible avec le paradigme épistémologique interprétativiste de la recherche qualitative. Nous proposons huit recommandations, fondées sur des lignes directrices en recherche qualitative pour évaluer et rapporter la fidélité intercodeur en recherche qualitative. Nous espérons qu'elles seront particulièrement utiles pour guider les chercheurs débutants dans les processus de codage et d'analyse des données qualitatives.

Factors influencing primary care provider referral for bariatric surgery: Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers to and facilitators of primary care provider (PCP) referral for bariatric surgery in patients with obesity. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched and reference lists of included articles were screened to identify additional relevant articles. Two reviewers independently reviewed citations and full-text articles, and appraised the quality of the included articles using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tool Qualitative Checklist and the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. They extracted data on the study characteristics and the barriers to and facilitators of PCP referral for bariatric surgery. Appraisal discrepancies were resolved through consensus among authors. STUDY SELECTION: Overall, 882 citations were identified and 18 articles were then selected for this review. SYNTHESIS: Barriers included fear of surgery complications and side effects, cost, lack of availability, perception that surgery is a quick fix or a last resort, and prior negative experiences. Facilitators included direct requests from patients, patient motivation, previously failed weight-loss interventions, and obesity-related comorbidities. Those PCPs who were knowledgeable about the risks and benefits of bariatric surgery were more likely to refer their patients. CONCLUSION: Education and continuing professional development programs regarding bariatric surgery are needed to improve PCP knowledge and capacity to manage patients with obesity. Also, educating the general public on obesity, weight management, and available treatment options can empower patients and families to manage their weight and pursue evidence-informed treatments.

Shaken and stirred: emotional state, cognitive load, and performance of junior residents in simulated resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Patient resuscitation can be overwhelming for junior postgraduate medical residents due to its inherent complexity and high-stakes environment. Emotional states of unpleasant hyperarousal burden cognitive resources, contributing to cognitive overload and performance decline. Our objective is to characterize the associations between pre-scenario emotional state and junior residents' cognitive load and performance in a simulated-resuscitation, to provide evidence for informed curricular development. METHODS: PGY-1 residents self-rated their emotional state before four simulated-resuscitation scenarios, and their cognitive load after. Faculty assessed performance with entrustment scores. Factor analysis identified the principal components of emotional state data. Linear regression models examined the relationship between pre-scenario emotional components, cognitive load, and performance scores. RESULTS: 47/47 medical and surgical residents (100%) participated and completed Emotional State (99.5%) and Cognitive Load (98.9%) surveys. Positive invigoration and negative tranquility were the principal components. Pre-scenario tranquility was negatively associated with cognitive load (b= -0.23, p < 0.0001), and cognitive load was negatively associated with performance scores (b= -0.27, p < 0.0001). Pre-scenario invigoration was negatively associated with cognitive load (b=-0.18, p = 0.0001), and positively associated with performance scores (b= 0.08, p = 0.0193). CONCLUSION: Amongst junior residents participating in simulated resuscitation scenarios, pre-scenario agitation (negative tranquility) is associated with increased cognitive load, which itself is associated with lower performance scores. These findings suggest residency programs should consider developing curriculum aimed at modulating residents' emotional agitation and reducing residents' cognitive burden to improve resuscitation performance.

CONTEXTE: La réanimation de patients peut être éprouvante pour les stagiaires postdoctoraux juniors en raison de la complexité qui y est inhérente et de la gravité de l'enjeu. Les états émotionnels désagréables d'hyperexcitation épuisent les ressources cognitives, contribuant ainsi à la surcharge cognitive et à la baisse de la performance. Notre objectif était de mettre en évidence le rapport entre l'état émotionnel des résidents juniors avant une simulation de réanimation d'un côté et leur charge cognitive et leur performance lors de celle-ci de l'autre, pour produire des données probantes pouvant servir à la conception éclairée de programmes d'enseignement. MÉTHODES: Des résidents de première année ont autoévalué leur état émotionnel avant chacun des quatre scénarios de réanimation simulée, ainsi que leur charge cognitive après les simulations. Des membres du corps professoral ont évalué leur performance par l'attribution de scores de confiance. Les principales composantes des données sur l'état émotionnel ont été déterminées par le biais d'une analyse factorielle. On s'est servi de modèles de régression linéaire pour établir la relation entre les composantes émotionnelles avant la simulation, la charge cognitive et les scores de performance. RÉSULTATS: Les 47 résidents en médecine et en chirurgie qui ont participé à l'étude (100 %) ont rempli les questionnaires sur l'état émotionnel (99,5 %) et la charge cognitive (98,9 %). La stimulation positive et la tranquillité négative sont les principales composantes dégagées. La tranquillité avant la simulation était négativement corrélée avec la charge cognitive (b= -0,23, p<0,0001), et la charge cognitive était négativement liée aux scores de performance (b= -0,27, p<0,0001). La stimulation avant la simulation était négativement corrélée avec la charge cognitive (b=-0.18, p=0.0001), et positivement corrélée avec les scores de performance (b= 0.08, p=0.0193). CONCLUSION: Chez les résidents juniors qui ont participé à des scénarios de réanimation simulée, l'agitation précédant cette dernière (tranquillité négative) était liée à une charge cognitive accrue, qui elle-même a donné lieu à des scores de performance plus faibles. Ces résultats montrent la pertinence de concevoir des programmes qui visent à réduire l'agitation émotionnelle et la charge cognitive des résidents afin d'améliorer leurs performances en réanimation.

Examining the accuracy of residents' self-assessments and faculty assessment behaviours in anesthesiology.

BACKGROUND: Residents' accurate self-assessment and clinical judgment are essential for optimizing their clinical skills development. Evidence from the medical literature suggests that residents generally do poorly at self-assessing their performance, often due to factors relating to learners' personal backgrounds, cultures, the specific contexts of the learning environment and rater bias or inaccuracies. We evaluated the accuracy of anesthesiology residents' self-assessed Global Entrustment scores and determined whether differences between faculty and resident scores varied by resident seniority, faculty leniency, and/or year of assessment. METHODS: We employed variance components modeling techniques and analyzed 329 pairs of faculty and self-assessed entrustment scores among 43 faculty assessors and 15 residents. Using faculty scores as the gold standard, we compared faculty scores with residents' scores (xi(faculty)-xi(resident)), and determined residents' accuracy, including over- and under-confidence. RESULTS: The results indicate that residents were respectively over- and under-confident in 10.9% and 54.4% of the assessments but more consistent in their individual self-assessments (rho = 0.70) than faculty assessors. Faculty scores were significantly higher (α = 0.396; z = 4.39; p < 0.001) than residents' self-assessed scores. Being a lenient/dovish (ß = 0.121, z = 3.16, p < 0.01) and a neutral (ß = 0.137, z = 3.57, p < 0.001) faculty assessor predicted a higher likelihood of resident under-confidence. Senior residents were significantly less likely to be under-confident compared to junior residents (ß = -0.182, z =-2.45, p < 0.05). The accuracy of self-assessments did not significantly vary during the two years of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of residents' self-assessments were inaccurate. Our findings may help identify the sources of such inaccuracies.

CONTEXTE: L'autoévaluation adéquate et le jugement clinique des résidents sont essentiels pour optimiser le développement de leurs compétences cliniques. Les données probantes de la littérature médicale indiquent que les résidents ont généralement du mal à s'auto-évaluer, souvent en raison de facteurs liés à leur passé personnel, à la culture, aux contextes spécifiques de l'environnement d'apprentissage et aux préjugés ou inexactitudes des évaluateurs. Nous avons évalué l'exactitude des scores d'autoévaluation par échelles de confiance globalepar des résidents en anesthésiologie et déterminé si les différences entre les scores des enseignants et des résidents variaient en fonction du niveau de formation des résidents, de l'indulgence des enseignants ou de l'année d'évaluation. MÉTHODES: Nous avons utilisé des techniques de modélisation des composantes de la variance et analysé 329 paires de scores de confiance des enseignants et d'autoévaluation avec la participation de 43 évaluateurs du corps professoral et 15 résidents. Prenant les scores des enseignants comme référence, nous avons comparé les leurs avec ceux des résidents (xi(enseignant) -xi(résident)), et déterminé l'exactitude chez les résidents, y compris l'excès et le manque de confiance. RÉSULTATS: Les résultats indiquent que les résidents étaient trop confiants dans 10,9 % des évaluations, et pas assez confiants dans 54,4 % des cas, mais qu'ils étaient plus cohérents dans leurs autoévaluations (rho = 0,70) que ne l'étaient les enseignants. Les scores du corps professoral étaient significativement plus élevés (α = 0,396 ; z = 4,39 ; p < 0,001) que les scores d'autoévaluation des résidents. Le fait d'être un évaluateur indulgent (ß = 0,121, z = 3,16, p < 0,01) et neutre (ß = 0,137, z = 3,57, p < 0,001) prédisait une probabilité plus élevée de sous-confiance des résidents. Les résidents seniors étaient significativement moins susceptibles de manquer de confiance en eux que les résidents juniors (ß = -0,182, z = -2,45, p < 0,05). L'exactitude des autoévaluations n'a pas varié de manière significative au cours des deux années de la période d'étude. CONCLUSIONS: La majorité des autoévaluations des résidents étaient inexactes. Nos résultats peuvent aider à identifier les sources de ces inexactitudes.

Undergraduate medical education interventions aimed at managing patients with obesity: A systematic review of educational effectiveness.

The growing obesity epidemic requires an evidence-based approach to management of patients with obesity. Two systematic reviews on obesity-management interventions in undergraduate medical education, both published in 2012, reported discrepant findings. This study aimed to build on previous research by identifying, systematically reviewing, and synthesizing current literature on the effectiveness of educational interventions aimed at teaching management of patients with obesity to medical students. A comprehensive search of seven databases was performed with no date or language restrictions. Database search identified 6462 studies; 5373 were screened against title and abstract, 156 full-text articles were retrieved, 31 met eligibility criteria, and 17 were included after critical appraisal of study methodology. Nine cohort-studies, three qualitative, two case-controls, two mixed-methods, and one randomized controlled trial were included. Findings supported the educational effectiveness of brief (<3 h) educational interventions, the value of video-clips to deliver content, and the importance of in-person teaching. Findings also demonstrated an increase in the number of studies describing educational interventions aimed at teaching management of patients with obesity to medical students. These results can be used by medical educators to inform the design of educationally effective curricula focused on the management of patients with obesity in undergraduate medical education.

Creating a Competency-Based Medical Education Curriculum for Canadian Diagnostic Radiology Residency (Queen's Fundamental Innovations in Residency Education)-Part 2: Core of Discipline Stage.

PURPOSE: All postgraduate residency programs in Canada are transitioning to a competency-based medical education (CBME) model divided into 4 stages of training. Queen's University has been the first Canadian institution to mandate transitioning to CBME across all residency programs, including Diagnostic Radiology. This study describes the implementation of CBME with a focus on the third developmental stage, Core of Discipline, in the Diagnostic Radiology residency program at Queen's University. We describe strategies applied and challenges encountered during the adoption and implementation process in order to inform the development of other CBME residency programs in Diagnostic Radiology. METHODS: At Queen's University, the Core of Discipline stage was developed using the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada's (RCPSC) competence continuum guidelines and the CanMEDS framework to create radiology-specific entrustable professional activities (EPAs) and milestones for assessment. New committees, administrative positions, and assessment strategies were created to develop these assessment guidelines. Currently, 2 cohorts of residents (n = 6) are enrolled in the Core of Discipline stage. RESULTS: EPAs, milestones, and methods of evaluation for the Core of Discipline stage are described. Opportunities during implementation included tracking progress toward educational objectives and increased mentorship. Challenges included difficulty meeting procedural volume requirements, inconsistent procedural tracking, improving feedback mechanisms, and administrative burden. CONCLUSION: The transition to a competency-based curriculum in an academic Diagnostic Radiology residency program is significantly resource and time intensive. This report describes challenges faced in developing the Core of Discipline stage and potential solutions to facilitate this process.

Creating a Competency-Based Medical Education Curriculum for Canadian Diagnostic Radiology Residency (Queen's Fundamental Innovations in Residency Education)-Part 1: Transition to Discipline and Foundation of Discipline Stages.

PURPOSE: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) has mandated the transition of postgraduate medical training in Canada to a competency-based medical education (CBME) model divided into 4 stages of training. As part of the Queen's University Fundamental Innovations in Residency Education proposal, Queen's University in Canada is the first institution to transition all of its residency programs simultaneously to this model, including Diagnostic Radiology. The objective of this report is to describe the Queen's Diagnostic Radiology Residency Program's implementation of a CBME curriculum. METHODS: At Queen's University, the novel curriculum was developed using the RCPSC's competency continuum and the CanMEDS framework to create radiology-specific entrustable professional activities (EPAs) and milestones. In addition, new committees and assessment strategies were established. As of July 2015, 3 cohorts of residents (n = 9) have been enrolled in this new curriculum. RESULTS: EPAs, milestones, and methods of evaluation for the Transition to Discipline and Foundations of Discipline stages, as well as the opportunities and challenges associated with the implementation of a competency-based curriculum in a Diagnostic Radiology Residency Program, are described. Challenges include the increased frequency of resident assessments, establishing stage-specific learner expectations, and the creation of volumetric guidelines for case reporting and procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Development of a novel CBME curriculum requires significant resources and dedicated administrative time within an academic Radiology department. This article highlights challenges and provides guidance for this process.

Analysis of factors affecting Canadian medical students' success in the residency match.

BACKGROUND: In North America, there is limited data to support deliberate application strategies for post-graduate residency training. There is significant interest in determining what factors play a role in Canadian medical graduate (CMG) matching to their first choice discipline and heightened concern about the number of students going unmatched altogether. METHODS: We analyzed matching outcomes of CMGs based on seven years (2013-2019) of residency application data (n= 13,499) from the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) database using descriptive and binary logistic regression modeling techniques. RESULTS: The sample was 54% female, with 60% between the ages of 26 and 29, and 60% attended medical schools in Ontario. Applicants who received more rankings from residency programs were more likely (OR = 1.185, p < 0.001) to match. Higher research activities (OR = 0.985, p < 0.001) and number of applications submitted (OR = 0.920, p < 0.001) were associated with a reduced likelihood of matching. Number of volunteer activities and self-report publications did not significantly affect matching. Being male (OR = 0.799, p < 0.05) aged <25 (OR = 0.756, p < 0.05), and from Eastern (OR = 0.497, p < 0.01), or Western (OR = 0.450, p < 0.001) Canadian medical schools were predictors of remaining unmatched. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified several significant associations of demographic and application factors that affected matching outcomes. The results will help to better inform medical student application strategies and highlight possible biases in the selection process.

CONTEXTE: En Amérique du Nord, les données qui soutiennent les stratégies délibérées de candidature pour la formation en résidence postdoctorale sont limitées. Il existe un intérêt important dans la détermination des facteurs qui jouent un rôle dans le jumelage des diplômés canadiens en médecine (DCM) à leur discipline de premier choix et dans les préoccupations croissantes au sujet du nombre d'étudiants non jumelés. MÉTHODES: Nous avons analysé les résultats des DCM sur une période de sept ans (2013-2019) à partir de données de demandes de résidence (n = 13 499) tirées de la base de données du Service canadien de jumelage des résidents (CaRMS) en utilisant des techniques de modélisation par régression logistique binaire. RÉSULTATS: L'échantillon comportait 54 % de femmes, avec 56 % âgées de 26 à 29 ans, et 60 % qui allaient à des facultés de médecine en Ontario. Les candidats qui avaient reçu plus de classements des programmes de résidences étaient plus susceptibles d'être jumelés (RC = 1,185, p < 0,001). Les activités scientifiques de pointe (RC = 0,985, p < 0,001) et un certain nombre de candidatures soumises (RC = 0,90, p < 0,001) étaient associées avec une probabilité réduite de jumelage. Un certain nombre d'activités bénévoles et des publications autodéclarées ne modifiaient pas le jumelage de manière importante. Être un homme (RC = 0,799, p < 0,05) âgé de moins de 25 ans (RC = 0,756, p < 0,05) et de facultés canadiennes de médecine de l'Est (RC = 0,497, p < 0,01) et de l'Ouest (RC = 0,450, p < 0,001) étaient des prédicteurs des candidatures non jumelées. CONCLUSIONS: Cette étude a établi plusieurs associations importantes de facteurs démographiques et de candidatures qui touchaient les résultats des jumelages. Les résultats aideront à mieux informer les stratégies de candidatures des étudiants en médecine et montrent les biais possibles dans le processus de sélection.

Perceptions and barriers to competency-based education in Canadian postgraduate medical education.

RATIONALE: Competency-based education (CBE) is currently being implemented across Canadian postgraduate medical education programmes through Competence by Design (CBD).1 Queen's University received permission to initiate CBE in all programmes simultaneously starting in 2017; an institutional initiative termed Competency-based medical education (CBME).2 We describe our initial experiences to highlight perceptions and barriers and facilitate implementation at other centers. METHODS: Anonymous online surveys were administered to faculty and residents transitioning to CBE (138 respondents) including (a) Queen's programme leaders (Programme Directors and CBME Leads) [n = 27], (b) Queen's residents [n = 102], and (c) Canadian neurology programme directors [n = 9] and were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. RESULTS: Perceptions were favourable (x = 3.55/5, SD = 0.71) and 81.6% perceived CBE enhanced training; however, perceptions were more favourable among faculty. Queen's programme leaders indicated that CBE did not improve their ability to provide negative feedback. Queen's residents did not perceive improved quality of feedback. National Canadian neurology programme directors did not perceive that their institutions had adequately prepared them. There was variability in barriers perceived across groups. Queen's programme leaders were concerned about resident initiative. Queen's residents felt that assessment selection and faculty responsiveness to feedback were barriers. Canadian neurology programme directors were concerned about access to information technology. RECOMMENDATIONS: Our results indicate that faculty were concerned about the reluctance of residents to actively participate in CBE, while residents were hesitant to assume such a role because of lack of familiarity and perceived benefit. This discrepancy indicates attention should be devoted to (a) institutional administrative/educational supports, (b) faculty development around feedback/assessment, and (c) resident development to foster ownership of their learning and familiarity with CBE.

A Pilot Study on Diagnostic Radiology Residency Case Volumes From a Canadian Perspective: A Marker of Resident Knowledge.

PURPOSE: New guidelines from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) have proposed minimum case volumes to be obtained during residency. While radiology residency programs in Canada are accredited by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, there are currently no minimum case volumes standards for radiology residency training in Canada. New changes in residency training throughout Canada are coming in the form of competency-based medical education. Using data from a pilot study, this article examines radiology resident case volumes among recently graduated cohorts of residents and determines whether there is a correlation between case volumes and measures of resident success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Resident case volumes for 3 cohorts of graduated residents (2016-2018) were extracted from the institutional database. Achievement of minimum case volumes based on the ACGME guidelines was performed for each resident. Pearson correlation analysis (n = 9) was performed to examine the relationships between resident case volumes and markers of resident success including residents' relative knowledge ranking and their American College of Radiology (ACR) in-training exam scores. RESULTS: A statistically significant, positive correlation was observed between residents' case volume and their relative knowledge ranking (r = 0.682, P < .05). Residents' relative knowledge ranking was also statistically significant and positively correlated with their ACR in-training percentile score (r = 0.715, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that residents who interpret more cases are more likely to demonstrate higher knowledge, thereby highlighting the utility of case volumes as a prognostic marker of resident success. As well, the results underscore the potential use of ACGME minimum case volumes as a prognostic marker. These findings can inform future curriculum planning and development in radiology residency training programs.

Validation of a novel strabismus surgery 3D-printed silicone eye model for simulation training.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the validity of a new 3D-printed silicone model for practicing strabismus surgery, compared with the rabbit head, in terms of simulator fidelity. METHODS: In this multicenter study, a validated questionnaire was developed to assess fidelity of the model and rabbit head. Participants were asked to rate overall globe, conjunctiva, muscle, and scleral fidelity using a 5-point scale. The survey instrument was disseminated at three strabismus instruction courses: at two meetings, participants practiced on the model and rabbit head prior to completing the questionnaire; at the third, instructors demonstrated advanced surgical skills using only the model and then completed the questionnaire. Repeated measures analysis of variance compared ratings. Pearson's or Spearman's correlation evaluated correlation between years of experience to participants' responses. Qualitative data were coded into themes. RESULTS: A total of 47 participants completed the questionnaire. The model rated 18% higher than rabbit head for anatomical accuracy (mean difference, 0.667; P = 0.001) and 25% higher for position of eyes within the head (mean difference, 0.867; P = 0.006). More experienced participants were more likely to strongly agree that the silicone conjunctiva effectively mimics real conjunctiva (ρ = 0.337; P = 0.036) and that scleral tissue effectively mimics real sclera (ρ = 0.298, P = 0.042). Qualitative data supported the model. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the validity of the surgical model in terms of fidelity compared to the rabbit head.

A case for feedback and monitoring assessment in competency-based medical education.

PURPOSE: Within competency-based medical education, self-regulated learning (SRL) requires residents to leverage self-assessment and faculty feedback. We sought to investigate the potential for competency-based assessments to foster SRL by quantifying the relationship between faculty feedback and entrustment ratings as well as the congruence between faculty assessment and resident self-assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected comments in (a) an emergency medicine objective structured clinical examination group (objective structured clinical examinations [OSCE] and emergency medicine OSCE group [EMOG]) and (b) a first-year resident multidisciplinary resuscitation "Nightmares" course assessment group (NCAG) and OSCE group (NOG). We assessed comments across five domains including Initial Assessment (IA), Diagnostic Action (DA), Therapeutic Action (TA), Communication (COM), and entrustment. Analyses included structured qualitative coding and (non)parametric and descriptive analyses. RESULTS: In the EMOG, faculty's positive comments in the entrustment domain corresponded to lower entrustment score Mean Ranks (MRs) for IA (<11.1), DA (<11.2), and entrustment (<11.6). In NOG, faculty's negative comments resulted in lower entrustment score MRs for TA (<11.8 and <10) and DA (<12.4), and positive comments resulted in higher entrustment score MRs for IA (>15.4) and COM (>17.6). In the NCAG, faculty's positive IA comments were negatively correlated with entrustment scores (ρ = -.27, P = .04). Across programs, faculty and residents made similar domain-specific comments 13% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal and inconsistent associations were found between narrative and numerical feedback. Performance monitoring accuracy and feedback should be included in assessment validation.

The Implementation of a Multi-institutional Multidisciplinary Simulation-based Resuscitation Skills Training Curriculum.

Competency-based curricula require the development of novel simulation-based programs focused on the assessment of entrustable professional activities. The design and delivery of simulation-based programs are labor-intensive and expensive. Furthermore, they are often developed by individual programs and are rarely shared between institutions, resulting in duplicate efforts and the inefficient use of resources. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a previously developed simulation-based curriculum at a second institution. We sought to demonstrate comparable program-level outcomes between our two study sites. A multi-disciplinary, simulation-based, resuscitation skills training curriculum developed at Queen's University was implemented at the University of Saskatchewan. Standardized simulation cases, assessment tools, and program evaluation instruments were used at both institutions. Across both sites, 87 first-year postgraduate medical trainees from 14 different residency programs participated in the course and the related research. A total of 226 simulated cases were completed in over 80 sessions. Program evaluation data demonstrated that the instructor experience and learner experience were consistent between sites. The average confidence score (on a 5-point scale) across sites for resuscitating acutely ill patients was 3.14 before the course and 4.23 (p < 0.001) after the course. We have described the successful implementation of a previously developed simulation-based resuscitation curriculum at a second institution. With the growing need for competency-based instructional methods and assessment tools, we believe that programs will benefit from standardizing and sharing simulation resources rather than developing curricula de novo.

Religion, religiosity and premarital sexual attitudes of young people in the informal settlements of Nairobi, Kenya.

Although attitudes to premarital sex may be influenced by several factors, the importance of religion to that discourse cannot be underestimated. By providing standards to judge and guide behaviour, religion provides a social control function such that religious persons are expected to act in ways that conform to certain norms. This study investigated the interconnectedness of several dimensions of religion and premarital sexual attitudes among young people in the informal settlements of Nairobi, Kenya. Using reference group as the theoretical base, it was found that those affiliated with Pentecostal/Evangelical faiths had more conservative attitudes towards premarital sex than those of other Christian faiths. Additionally, while a high level of religiosity was found to associate with more conservative views on premarital sex, the effect was more pronounced among Pentecostal groups. The findings are discussed in relation to programmes on adolescent sexuality.